Blow Molder
Norland offers a variety of small and large bottle blow molders and support equipment.
Norland Xr-46 Service Manual. ? Aplikasi tidak kompleks seperti yang lainnya, cukup simple sehingga sangat memudahkan didalam penggunaa aplikasi struk spbu sendiri. Software Cetak Struk SPBU V.2.15 Full Keygen, UNISOFT, Software Cetak Struk SPBU V.2.15. XR Rider Scrubber XR 46-C GENERAL Machine shall be of the type generally described as a battery-powered rider scrubber: Factory Cat The specific model and size should be: XR 46-C This bid defines a self-propelled machine that wet 'scrubs and dry' vacuums a path of: 46' For expedited parts delivery, machine shall be made in: United States.
Mold Chiller
Norland's Blow Mold Chillers are an important step in the blow-molding process!
Blow Molder High Pressure Air Tank
The high pressure air tank ensures continuous operation of your blow molder by ensuring a steady supply of product air.
Air Dryer Filter
The Norland Air Dryer Filter removes moisture from the blow molder, ensuring smoother operation and longer life of the machine.
Air Compressor
Norland's air compressors provide a steady stream of air to ensure the smooth operation of the equipment.
Unscrambler
Norland's Liberty 150™ bottle unscrambler sorts, and aligns up to 150 bottles per minute for precise and consistent delivery to your bottled water line.
Triumph Rotary Series - Rinse, Cap, Fill
Norland's Triumph Rotary Series - Rinse, Cap & Fill.
The multi-functional medium speed mono-block rotary filling system has proven to be a reliable and effective workhorse for the bottled water industry.
Speeds of up to 2000 bottles per hour (or more pending rotary size) can be achieved on this durable and dependable system, which includes 8 rinse valves, 8 fill heads and 4 cap head assemblies. (Speeds vary pending system, contact us to learn more)
The continual motion of a rotary filling line is what sets it apart from in-line systems and other lower speed alternatives.
Waterfall Capper
Norland's Waterfall Capper contains a storage bin that can hold caps, convey them up to the cap applicator, and place them onto bottles at a rate of up to 5,000 caps per hour.
Labeler-Date Coder
Norland's labeler and date coders seamlessly applies your labels and freshness date to every bottle.
![Norland Xr 46 Service Manual Norland Xr 46 Service Manual](/uploads/1/1/8/3/118354933/950031461.jpg)
Ozone System
Norland Ozone Systems are complete frame mounted modules designed specifically for high quality bottled water operations and can produce enough ozone to treat up to 90 gallons per minute.
Water Storage Tanks
Norland's water storage tanks come in a variety of sizes and is a sanitary way to hold product water to ensure a steady supply for your packaging operation.
Water Treatment Systems
Norland builds your custom water treatment system based on your water analysis and bottling requirements.
Large Bottle Equipment
Norland's Triton160™ and Triton450™ systems are ideally suited to meet your large bottling needs. Each system will rinse, fill and cap your 3 & 5 gallon bottles. For smaller operations, the BWF 60 is a manually-operated machine still built to exacting Norland standards, but at a fraction of the cost.
ShrinkPak - Heat Tunnel
Norland's ShrinkPak™ will quickly and efficently wrap your bottles in plastic and then send it to the heat tunnel, where the plastic is shrunk and fitted to encircle your case.
Dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is widely used by clinicians and researchers for evaluation of bone status and soft tissue composition. While the principles of DXA technology could be found elsewhere [1, 2, 3] and are not the focus of this report, we address them briefly for better understanding of the discussion to follow. The underlying principle of DXA is its ability to quantify the attenuated radiation after its passage through bone and soft tissue using either K-edge filters or pulsed power sources to the x-ray tube. Subsequently, the differential attenuation of the two energies is utilized to quantify bone, lean, and/or fat tissue. The earlier DXA series are based on pencil-beam absorptiometry, where a highly collimated x-ray beam and a detector move along the rectilinear scan path. The new series employ fan-beam absorptiometry in which data are acquired either simultaneously along the entire scan line, or as rectilinear scanning with a narrow fan-beam, both resulting in a faster scanning time [1]. The fan beam densitometers have the advantage of improved geometrical resolution, but the disadvantage of errors induced by magnification effects. Within the fan beam instruments, the true fan beam densitometers have greater accuracy and precision, shorter scan time, and wider scan field than limited-angle fan beam densitometers which have inherent overlap in acquisition, smaller number of detectors, and poorer image quality [3].
The three major commercial manufacturers of bone densitometers are GE Medical Systems Inc. (former Lunar), Madison, WI; Hologic Inc., Waltham, MA; and CooperSurgical (former Norland Medical Systems, Inc.), Trumbull, CT. Although each of these companies employs a subtly different technology, our further discussion does not address the particulars of each technology and/or manufacturer. Our focus is the positioning of the overweight patients when obtaining densitometry scans and subsequent analyses of these scans, overlooked in many studies. However, for more information, the main physical characteristics of the most commonly used manufacturer/instruments are presented in Table Norland Xr 46 Service Manual Pdf
1Norland Xr 46 Service Manual 2016
![Norland xr 46 service manual 2017 Norland xr 46 service manual 2017](/uploads/1/1/8/3/118354933/917236109.jpg)
Weight limits and table dimensions of full-size densitometers of various manufactures and models
Manufacturer/ Densitometer | Weight Limit kg (lb) | Table Dimensions cm |
---|---|---|
GE Lunar Prodigy Advance | 159 (350) | 197.5 × 60 |
GE Lunar Prodigy | 136 (300) | 197.5 × 60 |
GE Lunar DPX-MD | 136 (300) | 196.8 × 57.6 |
Hologic QDR series | 136 (300) | 195.6 × 65- 67 |
Hologic Discovery Series | 159 (350) | 195.6 × 67 |
Norland XR-46 | 114 (250) | 193 × 64 |
Norland XR-36 | 114 (250) | 193 × 64 |
DXA is considered one of the most precise technologies in clinical medicine when the measurement of bone mineral density (BMD) is considered, with the typical coefficients of variation between 1–2% [4]. Nevertheless, there are some limitations in BMD assessment as well. Results of in vitro and in vivo studies indicate different manufacturers, models, software versions and modes of analysis of densitometers can lead to variations in the assessed BMD and bone mineral content (BMC) in the same individuals [5, 6]. Laskey et al (2004) found that the GE Lunar Prodigy gave significantly higher BMD, BMC and t-scores compared to the GE Lunar MD in 10 volunteers [6]. They also found that an increase in tissue depth (as in overweight individuals) caused an increase in the measured BMC and BMD for the MD model but not the Prodigy model, even when using the appropriate and same scan modes [6]. The prudent way to overcome these flaws would be to use the same instrument and software version throughout a single longitudinal study.
Norland Xr 46 Service Manual 2017
The accuracy of DXA instruments for measurement of soft tissue is also questioned due to various methodological limitations. Some of the limitations are addressed in a recent review [7] and are generally attributed to the hardware (fan- or pencil-beam) or software versions [8]. DXA instruments from different manufactures are shown to give considerably different soft tissue assessments of the same individual [9]. Lunar and Hologic are shown to give major differences in measurements of total body and regional body fat in HIV patients (2.4–13.4% higher values for Hologic) and in body fat distribution [9]. Additionally, individuals' hydration levels may affect calculations for soft tissue [7] whereas tissue thickness may affect beam magnification, especially if the proper scan mode is not chosen and in cases involving changes in subject's weight [10]. Also, estimates for soft tissue in regions directly adjacent to the large bony areas such as the trunk, arms and head, may result in decreasing precision. During the total body scans (to obtain body composition analysis) a larger pixel size is utilized and pixels that include smaller portions of bone may be counted as lean tissue [10]. Despite the above flaws, DXA can still be used for fairly accurate assessment of soft tissue composition or its change [7], particularly for groups and large-scale epidemiological studies, provided that its limitations are considered and adequately accounted for. However, it has to be noted that DXA technology is not approved by Food and Drug Administration for the individual assessment of body composition.
Currently, the most accurate method for measuring body composition is considered to be the four-compartment (4C) model in which fat free body tissue is divided into its constituent parts, namely water, protein and mineral. The 4C model then incorporates independent measurements of mineral, total body water and body density to derive body fat. The 4C model (though not a true gold standard) is often used as a criterion method to compare the accuracy of other methods for assessing body fat. This method however, is costly and time consuming and therefore not generally used in clinical settings. DXA (a two-compartment method) does not measure body water, which limits its accuracy in body composition assessment. However, since DXA offers quick and easy body fat assessment and is considered superior to many other methods, it is often used in clinical settings. Gately et al. [11] compared various body composition methods for assessing body fat in overweight and obese children. They found air-displacement plethysmography and DXA to be the most promising methods for body fat assessment in a clinical setting [11]. A study in non-obese women found DXA to be superior to waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio in predicting intra abdominal fat [12].
The use of DXA for assessment of body composition in overweight/obese individuals increased recently due to numerous weight reduction studies. While all of the above limitations of bone densitometers have been frequently addressed, the limitations of assessing body composition in overweight individuals due to incorrect positioning and subsequent failures to properly analyze the obtained scans have not received any attention and are the focus of this report. We discuss proper ways of measuring overweight individuals and assessing their soft tissue and point to some studies where that may not have been the case.